Which Of The Below Given Technique Is Avoided During Negotiating


Answers ( 2 )


    Which Of The Below Given Technique Is Avoided During Negotiating

    Negotiating can be a difficult process, but it’s also an important one. Negotiating effectively can result in better deals and improved relationships. However, there are a number of techniques that are often avoided during negotiations, which can lead to frustration on both sides. In this blog post, we will explore four of the most common negotiation techniques that are often avoided and why they may be ineffective. Armed with this knowledge, you’ll be able to negotiate more effectively no matter the situation.

    Active Listening

    Active listening is one of the most important techniques in negotiation. It involves taking the other person’s perspective and focusing on what they are saying. This allows for a more productive negotiation process.

    One of the most common mistakes negotiators make is trying to argue with the other party. This can lead to hostility and a decrease in willingness on the part of the other party to negotiate. Instead, try to listen attentively and respond with questions that will help clarify what the other person is saying.

    Another mistake negotiators make is not being prepared for the other person’s position. If you know what the other party’s position is, you can better understand why they are refusing to budge on an issue. In addition, preparation will give you ammunition when arguing your case.

    Disruptive Tactics

    When negotiating, it is important to remember that disruptive tactics will not work in your favor. If you are trying to force the other party into a position where they have no choice but to agree to your demands, they will likely use disruptive tactics to avoid making a decision that they may later regret. Instead, try to maintain a calm and rational demeanor, and focus on establishing a mutual understanding of what each side needs in order to reach an agreement.

    Timing Your Moves

    In order to negotiate successfully, it is important to know the timing of your moves. One technique that is avoided during negotiations is what is known as the “Straw Man Argument.” This technique consists of arguing a position that is different from the original position that was presented in order to get the other party to react. This can be used in order to test whether or not the other party has understood the original position. Another technique that is avoided during negotiations is waiting for the other side to make a mistake. Waiting for the other side to make a mistake can give you an advantage because it shows that you are willing to negotiate and does not have all of the information.

    Verbal Deception

    Verbal deception is a form of communication in which information is presented in a way that is not true. Verbal deception can be used during negotiations to gain an advantage over the other party. There are different types of verbal deception, and each has different consequences.

    The most common type of verbal deception is called positive misrepresentation. This involves presenting yourself in a positive light while hiding negative aspects of your personality or behavior. For example, you might say that you are a highly skilled negotiator when in reality you are relatively unskilled. By hiding your true abilities, you can make the other party think they are getting a better deal than they actually are.

    Another type of verbal deception is called negative misrepresentation. This involves presenting yourself in a negative light while hiding positive aspects of your personality or behavior. For example, you might say that you are an unpleasant person when in reality you are quite friendly. By hiding your true qualities, you can make the other party think they are getting a worse deal than they actually are.

    Negative misrepresentation can be very effective when it comes to making the other party feel insecure and vulnerable. For example, if you know the other party is allergic to bees, you might tell them that you have bee colonies on your property and offer to show them around (in order to induce fear). by doing this, you have successfully manipulated the other party into giving away more concessions than they would have otherwise.

    Positive misrepresentation is also possible, but it is less common. This involves presenting yourself in a positive light while hiding negative aspects of your personality or behavior. For example, you might say that you are an excellent negotiator when in reality you are relatively inexperienced. by hiding your true abilities, you can make the other party think they are getting a better deal than they actually are.

    Positive misrepresentation can be more effective than negative misrepresentation, because it allows the other party to see you as you really are. This can build trust and rapport, which can lead to future negotiations being more successful. However, positive misrepresentation is also less believable, so it may not be as effective in some cases.

    All forms of verbal deception have consequences. Positive misrepresentation can make the other party suspicious and resentful, while negative misrepresentation can lead to anger and frustration. Verbal deception is a powerful tool, but should be used wisely in order to avoid unwanted consequences.

    Taking Advantage of Emotions

    The technique of taking advantage of emotions is avoided during negotiation. Emotions can influence our decision-making process and can be used to get what we want. However, using emotions to manipulate people can backfire and lead to a loss in the negotiation.

    When negotiating, it is important to keep your emotions under control. You do not want to seem desperate or pushy. Instead, try to remain calm and collected. This will help you come across as intelligent and persuasive.

    Another technique that is often avoided during negotiations is the use of threats. Threats tend to scare people and can make them less willing to negotiate in the future. If you are going to make a threat, be sure that you are prepared to follow through with it. Otherwise, you will only scare your opponent and gain nothing in return.


    During negotiations, it is important to know the rule of thumb for which technique should be avoided. Most people think that assertiveness and confrontation are the best methods to use in negotiations, but this is not always the case. It is best to avoid ultimatums, threats, and insults during negotiations because they will only lead to negative results. Instead, try persuasion and bargaining techniques instead so that you can reach a mutually beneficial agreement.


    Negotiating is a necessary part of any business relationship. It can be difficult, but it’s essential in order to reach an agreement that both parties are happy with. One common negotiating technique that is avoided during negotiations is the use of threats. Threats can be very intimidating, and often times they don’t work as intended. They can also backfire and have the opposite of the intended effects. Instead, try one or more of the following techniques when negotiating: 1. Make your demands clear and concise. 2. Stick to your principles and ideals. 3. Be positive and respectful throughout the negotiation process.

    Power Negotiating

    Power negotiating is the act of using one’s position of strength to extract concessions from a negotiation partner. Techniques that are avoided during power negotiating include being aggressive,threatening, or appearing desperate. It is important to maintain a confident and assertive attitude while power negotiating, as this will help to project authority and set the tone for the exchange.

    When entering into a negotiation, it is helpful to have an idea of what you are looking for in terms of concessions. It is also important to remember that not all negotiations will lead to a successful outcome; some may be fruitless while others may result in more favorable terms. When negotiating, it is important to be realistic about your chances of success and understand which techniques are likely to work best for you.

    One key skill for power negotiators is the ability to listen carefully and attentively to what their negotiation partner has to say. By paying close attention, power negotiators can learn about their opponent’s interests and motivations, which can help them better understand where the other party stands on certain issues. Additionally, power negotiators should never forget that they still have the authority and influence over their negotiation partners; by demonstrating respect and understanding, they can often gain more favorable terms in a deal.

    The Nine Forms of Negotiation

    There are nine forms of negotiation, but some negotiators may be better off avoiding certain techniques. Some techniques are aggressive, which can result in the other side becoming defensive. Others are manipulative, which can backfire and lead to a loss for the negotiator. Here is a look at each technique and its effects:

    1. Probing: This technique is used to get information about the other side’s position. It can be done verbally or nonverbally. Verbal probing is asking questions that get close to the issue at hand while nonverbal probing is using body language such as tapping fingers or making facial expressions.

    2. Building Rapport: A successful negotiation starts with building rapport with the other side. This means finding common ground and establishing trust. The key is to be genuine and take actions that show you care about the other person’s concerns.

    3. Distributing Power: In order for negotiations to be successful, one party must have control over the situation and the other party must feel like they are being treated fairly. One way to achieve this goal is by distributing power among participants so that each side feels like they have a say in the outcome of the negotiation.

    4. Focusing On Needs: When negotiating, it’s important to focus on the needs of your own side instead of trying to convince the other side that what you’re asking for is fair or desirable. This will increase your chances of getting what you want since you’ll be more likely to come across as sincere.

    5. Making Offer: The best way to start a negotiation is by making an offer. This will show the other side that you’re serious about resolving the issue and that you’re not going to back down easily. However, make sure that your offer is realistic and achievable.

    6. NEGOTIATING CRITERIA: When negotiating, it’s important to have clear negotiating criteria in mind. This will help you stay focused and avoid getting sidetracked by irrelevant details. The key factors to consider include the benefits of reaching a resolution, the costs associated with reaching a resolution, and the timeline for reaching a resolution.

    7. Provoking Reactions: One of the most effective ways to get the other side to respond is by provoking reactions. This can be done through body language or verbally using provocative language. Be sure not to overdo it, though—the other side may become angry and refuse to negotiate in a constructive manner.

    8. Persuading With Logic: When trying to persuade someone, use logic and facts instead of emotion or personal stories. This will help your argument sound more credible and will make it more likely that the other person will agree with you.

    Role Playing

    Role playing is a technique that is often avoided during negotiating. There are several reasons why role playing may be avoided. One reason is that it can be difficult to get everyone on the same page. Another reason is that it can create too much ambiguity. Both of these issues could lead to deadlock or impasse in the negotiation.

    There are, however, a few times when role playing can be helpful in negotiations. One time is when you are trying to negotiate with someone who is very resistant to change or negotiation in general. Role playing can help you create a scenario where you are asking for something that the other person might be willing to consider.

    Another time when role playing can be helpful in negotiations is when you want to test out a proposal or idea without actually committing to it. By pretending to agree to something, you can see how the other party reacts and whether they will actually follow through on their commitments.

    Time Pressure

    In negotiations, time pressure can often be a factor. There are many techniques that can be used to deal with this, but some are avoided more than others.

    One technique that is avoided is interrupting the other person. This can be seen as rude and will often result in the other person becoming defensive. It is also important not to rush the other person, as this will also create time pressure.

    Another technique that is avoided is putting all of our cards on the table at once. This can make the other person feel like they have to compete with us and can lead to them being less willing to negotiate. It is important to take things one step at a time and build up trust before presenting our full case.

    There are many techniques that can be used when negotiating under time pressure, but it is important to choose one that feels comfortable for both parties involved.

    Building Trust

    Many negotiators avoid one technique in particular during negotiations: intimidation. Intimidation is when a person uses their power or authority to force someone else to do what they want. It can come in different forms, such as making threats, being rude, or being accusatory.

    One of the most common ways that people use intimidation is by using threats. Threats are often vague and carry a lot of weight because they represent a potential danger. For example, “I’ll fire you if you don’t agree to this salary” carries a lot more weight than “I’ll give you a raise if you agree to this salary.” This is because the first threat implies that the negotiator might actually fire the employee, while the second only means that they will give them a raise.

    The other form of intimidation is rudeness. Rudeness is not just speaking harshly; it’s also acting impatient or angry without cause. For example, saying things like “This isn’t going to take long” when it clearly is taking longer than expected would be considered rude.

    Accusatory statements are another way that negotiators can intimidate their opponents. Accusatory statements are made with the intention of casting doubt on the character or motivations of an opponent. For example, “You must be thinking about quitting because you’re not willing to negotiate” would be an accusatory statement.


    It is important to know the correct way to negotiate, in order to secure a favourable outcome. However, some negotiating techniques are better avoided during negotiations in order to maintain an advantageous position. By understanding which tactics are most likely to backfire and avoid them when possible, you can set yourself up for success.

Leave an answer