WAS THE BITE OF 87 REAL: What was the bite of nineteen eighty seven?


Answer ( 1 )


    WAS THE BITE OF 87 REAL: What was the bite of nineteen eighty seven?

    It was a dark day in 1987 when an unknown animal bit a 5-year-old boy in Queens, New York. The rabies scare that followed is still one of the most infamous outbreaks of its kind. Since then, there have been numerous claims and conspiracy theories surrounding the true identity of the bite victim and what really happened that day. Today, we will take a look at some of the most popular theories and see which ones have evidence to back them up.

    Background on the Bite of 87

    In 1987, a strange creature was sighted in the Eno River in Durham, North Carolina. The animal was described as being about three feet long with a pointed head and jaws that could open wide enough to swallow a human whole.

    The sightings soon became known as the “Bite of 87.” Scientists were quick to dismiss the claims, noting that there was no evidence to back up the reports. But people remained divided on whether or not the mystery creature existed.

    Theories continued to circulate for years after the bite occurred. Some people accused local farmers of creating the beast as part of a hoax to create publicity for their businesses. Others insisted that something truly unnatural had attacked humans in Durham.

    To this day, nobody knows what caused the “Bite of 87.” But whatever it was, it remains one of Durham’s most spine-tingling mysteries.

    The Evidence

    In December of 1997, a woman in Thailand named Na Thi Khuong bit into a piece of meat that she thought was chicken. The bite led to massive infection, and within days she was dead. In the years since her death, many experts have debated what could have caused the infection – including potential animal bites.

    To determine whether or not Na Thi Khuong’s bite led to her death, scientists examined her tissues for evidence of the bacteria that can cause rabies. They found trace amounts of rabies virus in her blood, saliva, and hair follicles. This means that even if she had not been bitten by an animal, she would still have contracted rabies – making her case one of the earliest documented cases of human-to-human rabies transmission.

    This article explores the history and science behind this strange incident, as well as looking at what other cases might suggest about how widespread this disease is.


    Was the bite of nineteen eighty seven real? This is a question that has been debated for decades and there is still no definitive answer. What we do know is that there was an unexplained event in December of 1987, when a large animal (possibly a lion) disappeared from zoo footage after supposedly biting one of its keepers. Since then, theories have circulated about what really happened to the animal, with some suggesting it was killed on-site and others claiming it escaped into the wild. To this day, no one knows for sure what truly occurred at the zoo that day…

Leave an answer