Classical Mechanics Does Not Provide Satisfactory Explanation For?
Classical mechanics is a great tool for predicting the motions of objects. However, it does not work well for certain phenomena, such as non-uniform motion and many types of waves.
Newton’s law of universal gravitation failed to predict the orbit of Uranus.
Newton’s law of universal gravitation failed to predict the orbit of Uranus. The discrepancy was that the planet Uranus was moving faster than expected, so it was assumed that there was another planet orbiting around it. However, when astronomers looked for this additional planet, they did not find anything beyond Neptune (which had already been discovered). It turns out that Newton’s law does not take into account the influence of other planets on each other’s motion; therefore, it could not predict how these bodies would move in space without taking into account their mutual gravitational effects on each other!
Einstein’s relativity theory was able to explain the discrepancy.
Einstein’s relativity theory was able to explain the discrepancy. Einstein’s theory is a more complete and accurate description of the universe than Newtonian mechanics, which can be thought of as an approximation to relativity theory.
Newtonian mechanics does not explain why charge is conserved in static electric fields unless one introduces special fields for charges and current sources.
Although the electric field is due to the presence of charges, it does not follow that conservation of charge obtains in static electric fields. To see this, consider the following example:
- Consider an electric field which depends on position as
where (r) is an arbitrary function representing some dependence on position and time. If we assume that there are no sources or sinks for charge within our region of interest (i.e., ), then we expect that there will be no change in total amount of positive or negative charge within our volume over time; however, Maxwell’s equations imply otherwise! In particular, they imply that there must be some current density at every point in space such that . This means that Maxwell’s equations actually violate conservation laws!
Maxwell’s equations incorporate this effect by including the electric charge density within their formulation.
This can be seen by rewriting Maxwell’s equations in the form
where and are the charge density and current density, respectively. The first term on the right-hand side of this equation is our original expression for divergence free currents (i.e., ), while the second term accounts for the fact that there must be some electric charge density spread throughout space at each point.
Classical mechanics has some problems explaining certain phenomena
Classical mechanics has some problems explaining certain phenomena. Newton’s law of universal gravitation failed to predict the orbit of Uranus, which led to Einstein’s relativity theory being able to explain the discrepancy. In classical electromagnetism, there is no simple way of showing that charge is conserved in static electric fields unless one introduces special fields for charges and current sources.
In conclusion, classical mechanics does not provide satisfactory explanation for certain phenomena. For example, Newton’s law of universal gravitation failed to predict the orbit of Uranus and Einstein’s relativity theory was able to explain this discrepancy by introducing special fields for charges and current sources. Maxwell’s equations incorporate this effect by including the electric charge density within their formulation
Answers ( 2 )
Classical Mechanics Does Not Provide Satisfactory Explanation For?
Classical mechanics has been the reigning theory of physics for over two centuries now. And in that time, it’s managed to explain a great deal about the physical world. However, there are some phenomena that classical mechanics cannot explain, and these problems have led to the development of modern physics. In this blog post, we will explore one particular problem with classical mechanics—the inability to explain the behavior of particles in a complex system. We will discuss the various theories that have been developed to try and address this issue, and we will give you an idea of how these theories have led to modern physics.
Classical mechanics does not provide a satisfactory explanation for the behavior of objects in space. This is because the equations that describe motion are extremely derived and do not always reflect the actual physical reality. Additionally, these equations are very difficult to apply numerically, which can create inaccuracy in predictions. In fact, many physicists now believe that a more accurate description of reality comes from quantum mechanics.
Classical Mechanics Cannot Explain The Force-Velocity Relationship
In classical mechanics, the force-velocity relationship is one of the most fundamental relationships between physical quantities. It states that a constant force applied to an object will cause a proportional change in its speed. However, classical mechanics cannot satisfactorily explain why this relationship exists.
One common explanation for the force-velocity relationship is Newton’s third law of motion. According to this law, every action has an equal and opposite reaction. This means that when a force is applied to an object, it will cause a change in velocity in the opposite direction.
However, this explanation doesn’t account for all cases where forces are applied to objects. For example, when two objects are pushed together, their combined mass might cause them to move forward even though no individual force is being applied.
Another possible explanation for the force-velocity relationship is energy. Classical mechanics states that energy is conserved, which means that it can never be destroyed or converted into some other form. Therefore, if energy is responsible for causing changes in velocity, then classical mechanics would need to accounted for all types of physical interactions where energy is involved.
Neither of these explanations provide a satisfactory explanation for the force-velocity relationship as they both leave out important details about how classical mechanics works. It’s possible that there’s another underlying principle that classical mechanics doesn’t fully understand yet.
A New Theory Is Required To Explain The Force-Velocity Relationship
The force-velocity relationship is a key aspect of classical mechanics, but it has long been considered to be unsatisfactory. A new theory is required to explain the relationship, and this has been confirmed by experiments.
Classical mechanics describes the behavior of particles in relatively small spaces. It works well when objects are close together, but it doesn’t account for things like bullets flying through the air. This discrepancy was first noticed in the early 1800s and was called the ‘paradox of velocity’.
The paradox of velocity is simple: if you shoot a cannonball off a cliff, it will travel faster than if you released it from a short distance away. The paradox can only be solved by introducing a new theory that takes into account how energy is transferred between particles.
Modern physics has already introduced such a theory – called general relativity – and it provides an accurate explanation for how bullets fly through the air. General relativity allows us to understand how energy is transported between particles and gives us a better understanding of how forces work.
The classical mechanics model has not been able to provide satisfactory explanations for certain phenomena over the years. In fact, some scientists have even suggested that it might be time to completely overhaul this old model in order to accommodate for the new discoveries being made in quantum mechanics. However, before we jump ship, it would behoove us to see if there are any potential alternatives that could offer a better explanation for these phenomena.
Classical mechanics is a branch of physics that deals with the motion of objects. It is typically contrasted with quantum mechanics, which deals with the behavior of subatomic particles. Classical mechanics was developed by Isaac Newton and Jean le Rond d’Alembert in the 17th century, and later refined by others including Leonhard Euler, Joseph Louis Lagrange, and William Rowan Hamilton. It can be used to predict how objects move under different conditions such as for objects thrown through air or falling through water.
Newton’s first law states that an object at rest tends to stay at rest, and an object in motion tends to stay in motion with the same speed and in the same direction unless acted upon by an unbalanced force.
The first law states that an object at rest tends to stay at rest and an object in motion tends to stay in motion with the same speed and in the same direction unless acted upon by an unbalanced force. This is often called Newton’s first law of inertia, though he did not use this term himself. Inertia is defined as resistance to acceleration (change of velocity).
Newton’s second law states that a force is equal to the product of the mass of an object and its acceleration.
Newton’s second law states that a force is equal to the product of the mass of an object and its acceleration. The mass of an object is the measure of its resistance to being accelerated by a force; it is directly proportional to its inertia, which in turn depends on how much matter it contains.
The acceleration of an object is directly proportional to the net force acting on it:
Newton’s third law states that for every action there is an equal and opposite reaction.
The third law of motion states that for every action there is an equal and opposite reaction. It’s most useful in applied physics, where it helps us calculate the forces on an object or torque on an object.
Classical mechanics does not give a complete explanation for all behavior of objects in nature
Classical mechanics does not give a complete explanation for all behavior of objects in nature. For example, the law of gravity does not explain why objects move the way they do. There are also situations where Newton’s laws are violated by certain systems and phenomena. For example, quantum mechanics describes how electrons behave under different conditions; however, classical mechanics cannot be used to describe this behavior because it is impossible to mathematically model what happens when you look at an electron from every possible angle at once (which is what would be required).
Classical mechanics is a powerful tool for understanding motion, but it does not give us a complete picture of how nature works. In fact, some of its predictions have been proven wrong by experiment. For example, Newton’s first law states that an object at rest tends to stay at rest and an object in motion tends to stay in motion with the same speed and direction unless acted upon by an unbalanced force. However, this law fails when considering very small objects like atoms or molecules because their momentum can change due to random collisions even if no external forces act on them!